Fare-Free Transit
Our goal: To win a free, accessible, and reliable public transit system for the East Bay’s multiracial working class through a progressive tax measure.
What is Fare Free?
A fare-free transit system is any system which does not require a passenger-fare to ride. A fully fare-free system abolishes fares for all riders, at all times, within a given transit service area. Partial fare-free systems waive fares for certain riders (for instance, youth or low income riders), during certain times, or on particular lines. In the US, Kansas City has fully removed fares and the movement is growing with LA Metro and other transit systems beginning feasibility studies.
Why Have Fare Free?
By removing fares, we can ensure that everyone has access to the transportation needed to live healthy,fulfilling, and dignified lives. The idea of the “Right to the City” entails that all residents can travel freely to vital urban services such as jobs, education, and healthcare as often as they would like and fare-free studies have noticed that residents make more of these kinds of journeys overall.
Other benefits:
- Increases ridership by 20-60%
- Money that would have gone to the farebox instead goes to low and middle income residents, improving economic equality and supporting local businesses. At AC Transit, the average riders would save $1000 each year.
- Racial equity - At AC Transit, 75% of riders identify as people of color
- Class equity - At AC Transit, the majority of riders are low-income and data shows that a third of riders are unemployed
- Addresses climate change - Fares lead to an uptick in transit ridership and a growing ridership results in reductions in carbon pollution as cars account for about 40% of California’s CO2 emissions. Fewer cars also means less traffic
- Urban vibrancy - Makes a city feel more “alive”, the kind of city that residents are proud to be a part of and that scores highly in livability metric
An Even Broader Why:
Public transit in the US often began as private entities where fares were required for operations. A strong labor and rider movement was required to turn these private entities into public institutions. In the case of AC Transit, the system became a public service in 1960, but still held onto the notion of fares. A strong labor and ridership movement will again be required in order for transit to exist fully in the public realm, as a free service for all, in a similar way to schools, libraries, community parks, firefighting and police services.
In short, fare free:
- Places transit in the same category of public services as schools, libraries, community parks, firefighting and police services
- Increases city vibrancy and livability
- Democratizes the service, making it equally available to everyone regardless of income, to use as often as they like
- Increases ridership and decreases street congestion, accidents and pollution
How: A Ballot Initiative Process
We believe the most realistic way to win this is through a voter-initiated ballot measure. A voter-initiated ballot measure allows us to control what goes into the law. It also means that the measure would only need 50% +1 of the vote to pass instead of a 2/3rds majority vote.
DSA has had success running and partaking in ballot measure campaigns in other parts of the country. In San Francisco, DSA played a key role in getting Prop C passed, which taxed businesses that grossed more than $50 million in order to fund housing and homelessness services. In Portland, DSA ran a campaign that was able to win free preschool for all through progressive taxation. These campaigns serve as models to East Bay DSA.
The Process:
- To get a measure on the ballot, it would require about 45,000 (+10,000 as buffer) signatures from registered voters within AC Transit’s special district.
- There is a six month time frame to collect signatures, but it is possible that time frame is made smaller by legal challenges.
- An example tax category: Progressive Parcel Tax - AC Transit currently levies a flat, $96 parcel tax on all property owners in the district. All landowners pay the same rate, no matter how large or expensive their property is. This is not equitable. A large corporate landowner, who owns a massive property, pays the same amount as a working family who owns a small home.